2016-2020 NBA Draft Retrospective
July 21, 2021
Introduction
Before I do my annual ranking of the upcoming NBA draft class, I figured it was about time to re-visit my previous rankings (2016, 2017, 2018, 2019, and 2020) and methodology and update my thinking. What have I been overrating? What have I been underrating? What players did I badly miss on and why? I'm going to try and put myself in the mindset that I do not know what type of career each player has had so far and just try to adjust their pre-draft rankings with my current day mindset of what is/is not important, but also keeping in mind that some of the player's career will likely seep into my brain, call it cognitive fallacy.
As a general trend, I think I noticed a few traits across the board I overrated and a few I underrated. First off, outside of bigs that have a chance to be elite All-NBA type players (e.g. Jaren Jackson Jr., DeAndre Ayton, Zion Williamson, Jonathan Isaac), I think I generally overrated big men. Having a Joel Embiid or Anthony Davis is a game changer, but otherwise it's the most easily replacable position in the league, so outside of the opportunity to draft a player with that potential, it seems a bit like wasting resources to draft a player who will take development time/roster space just to potentially become a player you can sign for a near vet minimum each offseason. Obviously bigs should still be drafted at SOME point, but I think my rankings over-rate them by a 5-15 FV points across the board. For example, I think if I were to re-do my 2016 board, I would still like Dragan Bender quite a bit, as he hits a lot of the indicators I like in a prospect, but having him #2 overall over some of the skilled guards and athletic wings seems too high. Similarly with Marquese Chriss and Zhou Qi and Deyonta Davis and Jakob Poeltl and so on and so on.
The second major trend is that I have been underrated shot creation full stop. My brain and eyes have been at a disjunction between what is aesthetically pleasing and what is effective. In theory, I want all the best teams to play like the early 2010's Spurs, succeeding through quick passing, decisive cutting, and overall cohesion. In practice, having an individual player who is able to create a good look for themselves or one of their teammates seems like an easier, more effective, and sustainable (at least currently) way to generate offense.
Even though I think I've been higher than consensus on a lot of wing players, I think I've still been underrating them. As a general, I think wings with two of {shooting, athleticism/frame, high-level basketball IQ/awareness} are some of most critical players in the league, and players with all 3 can become star level players without some of the other "star" traits like shot creation or ball handling.
Additional things I have now adjusted is to adjust down the important of guard defense while still maintaining the defensive importance and versatility of wings and bigs. I think age is very important for elite or raw players, but for lesser players (~45 FV and below) it's less so, as you are more looking for any capable rotation player, so if there is a highly productive older senior, it's not a terrible investment to make. Finally, I think I overrated a lack of data. I think I too often operated with the mentality of, "a player is capable until they prove they are not" versus "a player is incapable until proven otherwise". For example, a one-and-done player who doesn't play their freshman year. In the past, my mentality more along the lines of, "this player has yet to fail at anything", while now it is more closer to, "this player has yet to show they can do anything". Okay, now onto the yearly reviews (2016, 2017, 2018, 2019, 2020):
Players I was too high on:
- 2.
Dragan Bender - Maccabi Tel Aviv (Israeli Premier League)
(Old grade: n/a --> New grade: 45+)
- lack of sample = more uncertainty
- 4.
Kris Dunn - Providence
(Old grade: n/a --> New grade: 40+)
- college senior + lack of shooting, profiles more as a 3rd guard
- 5.
Timothe Luwawu-Cabarrot - KK Mega Basket (Adriatic League)
(Old grade: n/a --> New grade: 45)
- lack of sample = more uncertainty
- 7.
Marquese Chriss - Washington
(Old grade: n/a --> New grade: 45)
- like the profile, but has enough question marks (shooting + size + awareness) to have impact big upside
- 8.
Zhou Qi - Xinjiang Flying Tigers (Chinese Basketball Association)
(Old grade: n/a --> New grade: 40+)
- like the profile, but has enough question marks (quality of competition) to have impact big upside
- 10.
Deyonta Davis - Michigan State
(Old grade: n/a --> New grade: 40+)
- like the profile, but has enough question marks (lack of sample) to have impact big upside
- 11.
Jakob Poeltl - Utah
(Old grade: n/a --> New grade: 45)
- like the profile, but has enough question marks (shooting + mobility) to have impact big upside
- 14.
Domantas Sabonis - Gonzaga
(Old grade: n/a --> New grade: 45)
- like the profile, but has enough question marks (shooting + mobility + defense) to have impact big upside
Players I was too low on:
- 6.
Jaylen Brown - California
(Old grade: n/a --> New grade: 50+)
- athleticism/frame + volume + RCSI
- 9.
Jamal Murray - Kentucky
(Old grade: n/a --> New grade: 50)
- shooting + usage + shot creation
- UR.
Malik Beasley - Florida State
(Old grade: n/a --> New grade: 45+)
- shooting + usage + shot creation
Players I think I would have flat out missed on (at least 15 FV points off) if re-doing this today:
- UR.
Pascal Siakam - New Mexico State
(Old grade: n/a --> New grade: 40+)
- high motor + versatile size + defense, but lack of ceiling due to age and lack of shooting
Players I was too high on:
- 5.
Josh Jackson - Kansas
(Old grade: n/a --> New grade: 40+)
- free throw red flag, age, lack of playmaking
- 8.
Zach Collins - Gonzaga
(Old grade: n/a --> New grade: 45)
- like the profile, but has enough question marks (age + lack of sample) to have impact big upside
- 10.
John Collins - Wake Forest
(Old grade: n/a --> New grade: 45)
- like the profile, but has enough question marks (defense + playmaking) to have impact big upside
- 11.
Harry Giles - Duke
(Old grade: n/a --> New grade: 40+)
- like the profile, but has enough question marks (lack of sample) to have impact big upside
- 12.
Josh Hart - Villanova
(Old grade: n/a --> New grade: 45)
- 13.
Caleb Swanigan - Purdue
(Old grade: n/a --> New grade: 40+)
- like the profile, but has enough question marks (mobility + defense + playmaking) to have impact big upside
Players I was too low on:
- UR.
Malik Monk - Kentucky
(Old grade: n/a --> New grade: 45+)
- shooting + shot creation + RCSI
- UR.
Bam Adebayo - Kentucky
(Old grade: n/a --> New grade: 45)
- knowledge of role + RSCI + defensive versatility
- UR.
O.G. Anunoby - Indiana
(Old grade: n/a --> New grade: 45)
Players I think I would have flat out missed on (at least 15 FV points off) if re-doing this today:
- UR.
Bam Adebayo - Kentucky
(Old grade: n/a --> New grade: 45)
- knowledge of role + RSCI + defensive versatility
- UR.
O.G. Anunoby - Indiana
(Old grade: n/a --> New grade: 45)
This was the first year I used FV grades, and I don't think I was well calibrated. Nearly every original grade should have probably been lowered by ~5 FV across the board outside of the very top of the board.
Players I was too high on:
- 4.
Wendell Carter Jr. - Duke
(Old grade: 60 --> New grade: 50)
- great profile but lacks size or agility to profile as an impact big
- 5.
Marvin Bagley III - Duke
(Old grade: 60 --> New grade: 45)
- great athlete with #1 RCSI pedigree, but filled with question marks (defense + shooting + playmaking + length)
- 7.
Mohamed Bamba - Texas
(Old grade: 55 --> New grade: 45)
- great athlete with #4 RCSI pedigree, but filled with question marks (awareness + shooting + playmaking + strength)
Players I was too low on:
- 16.
Trae Young - Oklahoma
(Old grade: 50 --> New grade: 55+)
- primary option on offense + shot creation + passing + point guard defense can be hidden more easily than other positions
- Honorable Mention.
Collin Sexton - Alabama
(Old grade: 40 --> New grade: 45+)
- shot creation + usage + RCSI
- Honorable Mention.
Lonnie Walker - Miami
(Old grade: 40 --> New grade: 40)
- athleticism + big guard size
- UR.
Gary Trent Jr. - Duke
(Old grade: UR --> New grade: 45+)
- shooting + size + freshman minute load
Players I think I would have flat out missed on (at least 15 FV points off) if re-doing this today:
- 16.
Trae Young - Oklahoma
(Old grade: 50 --> New grade: 55+)
- primary option on offense + shot creation + passing + point guard defense can be hidden more easily than other positions
Most of the grades are still high by at least ~5 FV. I'll note the more egregious (at least a grade and a half) re-grades here.
Players I was too high on:
- 4.
Jaxson Hayes - C - Texas
(Old grade: 55 --> New grade: 45)
- like the profile, but has enough question marks (usage + playmaking + foul rate) to have impact big upside
- 5.
Jarrett Culver - SG - Texas Tech
(Old grade: 55 --> New grade: 45+)
- lack of pedigree (3-star recruit) + shooting questionmarks
- 6.
Talen Horton-Tucker - Iowa State
(Old grade: 55 --> New grade: 45+)
- great length and age, but shooting and playmaking question marks
Players I was too low on:
- HM.
Keldon Johnson - SF - Kentucky
(Old grade: 40 --> New grade: 45+)
- RCSI + frame + athleticism
- HM.
Darius Bazley - SF - New Balance
(Old grade: 40 --> New grade: 45+)
- RCSI + frame + athleticism
Players I think I would have flat out missed on (at least 15 FV points off) if re-doing this today:
- HM.
Cameron Johnson - PF - North Carolina
(Old grade: 40 --> New grade: 40)
- HM.
Luguentz Dort - SG - Arizona State
(Old grade: 40 --> New grade: 40)
This is the most in-line with my current thinking process, as it was only a few months ago, so not a lot to update here. And it's defeinitely too early to comment on players I would have badly missed on as well.
Players I was too high on:
- 4.
James Wiseman - C -
Memphis
(Old grade: 55+ --> New grade: 50)
- like the profile, but lack of sample heavily regresses the profile
Players I was too low on:
- 55.
Immanuel Quickley - SG -
Kentucky
(Old grade: 40 --> New grade: 45+)
- I had overrated his defense, but underrated his shooting and shot creation. Especially for guards, offense is more imprtant than defense, so he gets a 1.5 grade bump.